Chiang Mai vs Ulaanbaatar

Chiang Mai

Chiang Mai has a tropical savanna climate with three distinct seasons: hot, rainy, and cool. The city sits in a valley which traps heat and, unfortunately, smoke during the burning season (February-April).

Ulaanbaatar

Ulaanbaatar has one of the most extreme continental climates of any capital on Earth — short, pleasant summers and long, brutal winters with temperatures routinely below -30°C. Elevation (1,350 m), inland location, and Siberian-air dominance combine to produce January averages colder than Anchorage or Reykjavik. The tourist window is essentially June through mid-September; Naadam in mid-July is the festival peak.

Chiang Mai

Chiang Mai lacks a metro or rail system, so getting around relies on songthaews (red shared trucks), tuk-tuks, Grab ride-hailing, and rented scooters. The Old City is compact enough to walk or cycle. The city is currently building a light rail system planned for future years.

Walkability: The Old City is very walkable — roughly 1.5 km on each side — and most major temples are within easy walking distance of each other. The Nimmanhaemin area is also pedestrian-friendly. Beyond these areas, distances grow and motorized transport is needed.

Ulaanbaatar

Ulaanbaatar has no metro — a long-discussed system remains unbuilt — and the city is served by buses, trolleybuses, and an explosion of ride-hailing cars. Traffic congestion is legendary; the downtown grid clogs solid in the 8-9 am and 5-7 pm peaks. The city centre (Sükhbaatar Square, museums, Gandan Monastery) is walkable in fair weather, but ride-hailing is the practical default for most tourist journeys.

Walkability: The central 1–2 km grid around Sükhbaatar Square is comfortably walkable in summer. Beyond the core, distances become impractical on foot — Zaisan is 4 km south, Gandan is a 25-minute walk from the square, and the airport or Terelj require vehicles. Winter drops walkability to near zero for anyone without heavy boots and windproof layers.